{"product_id":"original-u-s-springfield-model-1822-cone-in-barrel-percussion-converted-musket-by-harpers-ferry-with-socket-bayonet-dated-1824","title":"Original U.S. Springfield Model 1822 Cone-in-Barrel Percussion Converted Musket by Harpers Ferry with Socket Bayonet - Dated 1824","description":"\u003cp\u003eOriginal item: One Only. The U.S. Model 1822 Musket was a .69 caliber smoothbore flintlock, with a 42-inch barrel and an overall length of 58 inches. It replaced the previous model 1816 musket, and often is viewed as a further development of that design, called the \"Model 1816 Type II\". One of the most noticeable differences in the Model 1822 is the attachment of the lower sling swivel. The forward part of the trigger bow was provided with an enlargement which was drilled to receive the sling swivel rivet. Previously, the sling swivel had been affixed to a stud in front of the trigger bow.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe Model 1822 was produced by the Springfield Armory, Harpers Ferry Armory, and numerous other contractors. It was eventually replaced by the Springfield Model 1835, which is also considered by many to be a continuation of the Model 1816, the \"Model 1816 Type III\". These were sometimes referred to as \"Whitney Flintlocks\" due to the large number made in New Haven, Connecticut by Eli Whitney.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn the 1850s, many of the Flintlock Muskets in Arsenal were converted to Percussion, which was a much more reliable and water-resistant ignition system. This involved all variants of the Model of the 1816, and helped to standardize the types of ammunition carried by the soldiers in the field. The easiest conversion type, often referred to as the “Belgian” style conversion, was to simply tap a threaded hole in the top of the breach of the barrel to permit the fitting of a percussion cone (aka “nipple”). The lock had the frizzen and other external parts removed, and the pan mostly cut off. Many of these were then used during the Civil War by local militias, especially in the South, which did not have the same industrial capacity.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis nice patinated example still has the remnants of the brass pan intact on the lock plate, and was originally manufactured at the \u003cem\u003eUnited States Armory and Arsenal at Harpers Ferry\u003c\/em\u003e itself in 1824, as indicated by markings on the tail of the lock plate:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ccenter\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eHARPERS\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/em\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFERRY\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/em\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1824\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/center\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThere is also a clear \u003cstrong\u003eFederal Eagle over U.S.\u003c\/strong\u003e on the lock plate in front of the hammer, which is crisp on the very good condition lock plate. The 42\" smooth bore barrel is still marked with \u003cstrong\u003eV \/ P \/ Eagle's Head\u003c\/strong\u003e on the left top of the breech, the correct proof marks for this era. The lock plate and breech area have powder burn and light oxidation, but fortunately the markings were spared. The left side of the stock below the lock screws has two faded inspection cartouches, as well as other stamped markings, definitely an avenue of future research.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe stock is in very good used condition with the usual scuffs and scratches from storage wear. There is some missing wood in front of the lock plate and under the hammer from powder burn, which caused the wood to erode. There is also a crack running from the breech through the lower lock screw, a very common place for stress cracks to occur. The lock is fully functional, holding at half cock and firing at full. Lock action is very strong but the hammer and trigger are just a bit loose. The ramrod is still present, and is the correct type.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe bayonet is in very good shape, showing a lovely matured patina, and is correctly stamped \u003cstrong\u003eUS\u003c\/strong\u003e on the ricasso, with inspector marking \u003cstrong\u003eEH\u003c\/strong\u003e underneath. It slides and locks onto the front of the barrel without issue.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA lovely example of an early stage in the evolution of the U.S. Musket, which saw further service by being converted to percussion, complete with the correct bayonet. Ready to research and display!\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpecifications (Musket):-\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eYear of Manufacture: 1824\u003cbr\u003eCaliber: .69\"\u003cbr\u003eCartridge Type: Ball and Powder\u003cbr\u003eBarrel Length: 42\"\u003cbr\u003eOverall Length: 57 ½\"\u003cbr\u003eAction type: Side Action Percussion Lock\u003cbr\u003eFeed System: Muzzle Loading\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpecifications (Bayonet):-\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBlade Length: 15 ½\"\u003cbr\u003eBlade Style: Triangular\u003cbr\u003eSocket Length: 3\"\u003cbr\u003eOverall length: 19” \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eHistory of the Model 1822 Musket:\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe War of 1812 had revealed many weaknesses in American muskets. The Model 1812 Musket was created in an attempt to improve both the design and manufacture of the musket. The Model 1816 made further improvements, and replaced the Model 1812. The Model 1812 had borrowed heavily from the design of the French Charleville model 1777 musket, and this design was retained for the Model 1816. The Model 1816 had a 42 inch long .69 caliber smoothbore barrel, similar to the Model 1812, but had a longer lock plate, a shorter trigger guard, and a longer bayonet than the Model 1812. The Model 1816 also had a more straight lined stock. The overall length of the weapon was 58 inches.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe Model 1816 musket was originally produced at the Harpers Ferry and Springfield Arsenals between 1816 and 1844. Around 675,000 were made, more than any other flintlock in U.S. history.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe Model 1816 was originally produced as a flintlock musket. Like many flintlock muskets, many of these were later converted to percussion cap, as the percussion cap system was much more reliable and weather resistant.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis model of Springfield musket was used by Texans during the Texas Revolution and by the US Army and militia during the Mexican-American War. During this conflict, the flintlock version of the Model 1816 was preferred by U.S. regular forces, due to percussion cap supply concerns.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIt was also used during the early years of the American Civil War until around 1862.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMany improvements to the Model 1816 were made, producing the Model 1822, Model 1835, Model 1840, and Model 1842. U.S. Ordnance Department referred to these as different models, but in other U.S. government documents they are referred to as a continuation of the Model 1816. Modern histories are similarly inconsistent in the nomenclature of these weapons.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNOTE: International orders of antique firearms MUST be shipped using UPS WW Services (courier). USPS Priority Mail international will not accept these. International customers should always consult their country's antique gun laws prior to ordering.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Original Items","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":42072406687813,"sku":"ONSV23MGD23","price":1695.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":false}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/1524\/1342\/files\/ONSV23MGD23__01.jpg?v=1728670947","url":"https:\/\/www.ima-usa.com\/products\/original-u-s-springfield-model-1822-cone-in-barrel-percussion-converted-musket-by-harpers-ferry-with-socket-bayonet-dated-1824","provider":"International Military Antiques","version":"1.0","type":"link"}