Original Item: Only one available. This is a very interesting example of the Model 1891 Argentine Mauser rifle, one of many "export" models made for foreign governments, all based on the Mauser Model 1889.

This example, like all of the Argentine Mausers made before 1896, was made by the renowned Company LUDWIG LOEWE of BERLIN, which from 1887 was actually part owner of Mauser Waffenfabrik. In late 1886, following the death of Ludwig Loewe, his younger brother Isidor took over the running of the company, and by the end of the year it became part of the legendary Deutsche Waffen- und Munitionsfabriken Aktiengesellschaft (German Weapons and Munitions public limited company), usually referred to as DWM. All Argentine Mausers made after this point were DWM marked, so any Loewe marked Mauser rifles are definitively Pre-1898 and considered antique by Federal law.

The left side of the receiver is marked with the production information:

As with almost all that we have seen, this example had the Argentine crest ground away, as happened with almost all Argentine arms sold out of service. The entire receiver was then smoothed out and reblued by importer VAM Dist. Co. LLC / Wooster OH, who stamped their name on the end of the receiver. They also stamped it with new serial number 3666, which makes it impossible to tell when it was manufactured between 1892 and 1896 unfortunately.

The metal finish overall is in very good to excellent condition, having been polished and reblued by the importer. The bolt is the correct original bright steel, as it was also refinished and cleaned, making this a very attractive example. The stock shows more wear, as they were usually not reconditioned like the metalwork was. There are the expected dents, dings, and chips from long service. The butt stock has had large sections of wood on the top and bottom replaced professionally, and the handguard looks to be an unissued replacement. The stock was also inlet around the receiver area, though we do not know why. The sling swivel is still correctly under the wrist, and the stock has reinforcement cross bolts are both the wrist and above the magazine.

The rifle cycles correctly, though the action is a bit stiff at times, as the bolt looks to have been swapped out with an unissued example, most likely by the importer. The bore has a bright finish showing clear lands and grooves, though they are definitely a bit rounded. This is a carbine that did see significant use while in service.

Another Military Contract from the Victorian era that Mauser managed to snag from all its European competitors. In lovely restored condition and ready to display!

Specifications-

Years of Manufacture: 1892-1896
Caliber: 7.65×53mm Mauser
Cartridge Type: Centerfire Cartridge
Barrel Length: 17 1/2 Inches
Overall Length: 37 Inches
Action type: Bolt-Action
Feed System: 5 round box magazine

More on the Model 1891 Argentine Mauser:

After the Mauser brothers finished work on the Model 71/84 for Germany in 1880, the design team set out to create a small caliber repeater that used smokeless powder. Because of setbacks brought on by Wilhelm Mauser's death, they failed to have the design completed by 1882, and the German Rifle Test Commission (Gewehr-Prüfungskommission) was formed. The commission preferred to create their own design, which was what became the Gewehr 1888, often called the "Commission Rifle".

In the meantime, Paul Mauser created two different variations of the same rifle, one with a stock strengthened with a barrel shroud and a traditional design following the layout of the 71 series, in hope he might be able to overturn the commission's decision, or at least sell his design to the Kingdom of Bavaria, which adopted its own arms. The two rifles became known as the 89 Belgian (with a barrel shroud) and the 91 Argentine (with a 71 layout) Mausers, identical in their function and feed system. The main features were the ability to use stripper clips to feed the magazine (a revolution in rate of fire), and its rimless cartridge (7.65 Argentine Mauser), advanced for the time.

The Mauser Company then set about trying to sell this new design. Unfortunately they failed to convince the Commission to reverse its decision, and the attempt to win over Bavaria did not succeed either. However, Mauser already had supplied arms to numerous countries, and when they were looking to update their rifles, they came back to Mauser. At the time, Belgium was looking to bolster its domestic arms industry, and felt that manufacturing a Mauser Design would really help them in this goal. This resulted in the founding of Fabrique Nationale d'Armes de Guerre, owned in part by Ludwig Loewe, to manufacture the Model 1889 Belgian Mauser. This company would go on to become a major arms manufacturer, which exists today as FN Herstal.

At the same time, the Ottoman Empire had a contract for Model 1877 Turkish Mausers, which were based on the model 1871. The contract however had an "escape clause" that allowed them to change the contract in the event of a more advanced Mauser system being developed. This resulted in a new contract for the Model 1890 Turkish Mauser. While this was taking place, the Argentine Small Arms Commission contacted Mauser in 1886 to replace their own Model 71s. Since they wished to keep retraining of their armed forces to a minimum, they went for the Mauser 91, as the operating principles were identical. As with other early Mausers, most such arms were made by the Ludwig Loewe company, who in 1896 joined with other manufactures to form Deutsche Waffen und Munitionsfabriken.

One of the principal defining features of the Belgian/Turkish/Argentine Mauser was its thin sheet steel jacket surrounding the barrel—a rather unusual element not common to any other Mauser mark of note. The jacket was instituted as a feature intended to maintain the effectiveness of the barrel and the solid wooden body over time, otherwise lengthening its service life and long-term accuracy when exposed to excessive firing and battlefield abuse. In spite of this approach, the jacketed barrel proved susceptible to moisture build-up and, therefore, introduced the problem of rust forming on the barrel itself–unbeknown to the user. In addition, the jacket was not perforated in any such way as to relieve the barrel of any heat build-up and consequently proved prone to denting. As such, barrel quality was affected over time regardless of the protective measure. Furthermore, another design flaw of the jacket was its extra steel content. Not only was it expensive but it was also needed in huge quantities to provide for tens of thousands of soldiers. By many accounts, the barrel jacket was not appreciated by its operators who depended on a perfect rifle in conflict. Another defining characteristic, unlike most Mausers, was a spring-loaded cock on closing bolt action resembling that of the British Lee-Metford, which predates the Mauser 1889 by five years. This development allowed for faster firing and was well received.